While exploring information about the walkability of neighborhoods, I came across the Walk Score website (also available as an iPhone application). Walk Score uses an algorithm based on the distance from your house to various amenities. The primary source of amenities that Walk Score uses is entries in Yelp, an online review service whose mission is “to connect people with great local businesses.” Entering my own address, I was shown a score of 85 – very walkable. A map shows symbols for the amenities, including ones that are obvious such as schools, grocery stores, restaurants, and other businesses (as well as some more questionable things such as Burger King and McDonalds).
Monthly Archives: November 2009
Veronica Moss Visits Times Square
Here’s a good look at what happens when you reclaim the urban environment from heavy motorized use!
Veronica Moss Visits Times Square
by Clarence Eckerson on Streetfilms.orgShe’s back! The woman you love to hate (and hate not to love) Veronica Moss, a Washington, D.C. lobbyist for – ahem! – the Automobile User Trade Organization (A.U.T.O.) In this “chapter”, she’s getting her first gander ever at the new pedestrian-friendly Times Square and she invited Streetfilms along to record her virgin journey.
Continue reading and watch the video over on Streetfilms.org
Dangerous by Design
As promised, the new Dangerous by Design report has been released by Transportation for America and Surface Transportation Policy Partnership. The full report is at http://t4america.org/resources/dangerousbydesign/, and the Nevada section is available at http://t4america.org/docs/dangerousbydesign/nevada.pdf.
Carson City looks quite good in the report because it did not have any traffic fatalities in 2007-2008, the period covered by the report. However, we have had two pedestrian fatalities in 2009, Eric Pryor and Denise Lohman, which is quite significant for our population size (54,867). There were also one or more fatalities in earlier years. If there are no more pedestrian fatalities in 2009, the rate would be 3.65 per 100,000 people, among the highest in the country. The resulting Pedestrian Danger Index for Carson would be 135, also one of the highest in the country. Of course for a town the size of Carson City, where one pedestrian death more or less can make a big difference, statistics will vary widely from year to year, and a rate of 3.65 may be no more typical than a rate of 0.
Las Vegas just missed the national top ten “worst” list, coming in at eleven. Nevada as a whole is above the national average, heavily influenced by both the population and the rate of fatalities in Las Vegas.
Roop Street Bike Lane Update
Bike Lanes were the first item on the agenda last night at the Regional Transportation Commission meeting, and Engineering firm Manhard Consulting, LTD was there to make their redesign presentation. The room was once again packed last night, but they weren’t familiar faces. Three of us from Muscle Powered attended, eager to hear the verdict.
As the speakers unveiled their redesign plan, it began to be apparent that things were looking good. Here’s a summary of the bike lane plan:
Summary of Changes to Include Bike Lanes
- Four lanes throughout project varying in width from 10′ to 11.25′ (10′ wide only at Long Street intersection)
- 5′ wide bike lane from Washington Street to Adams Street (Lane is measured from the stripe to the face of the curb, so subtract the width of the gutter)
- 4′ shoulder from Adams Street to Beverly Drive (again, subtract the width of the gutter)
- Left turn pockets at Washington, Highway 50/William, Corbett, and Long
The most interesting change to me was the left turn pockets. Last month the proposal was to fully delete the center turn lane. This new plan adds the turn pockets only where really needed, adding additional room for bike lanes, and reducing the amount of right-of-way property acquisition. More of the road can be utilized more of the time, and no space is wasted where you don’t need it.
Like I mentioned last month, the section from Adams Street to Beverly Drive is too narrow to include an official 5′ wide bike lane, so they are calling it a 4′ shoulder. I think this should still be wide enough for most cyclists, and there was talk that share the road signs should be installed along this section to enhance safety.
The commissioners asked a few questions after the presentation, but overall, the mood was great and they once again agreed that the additional costs to the project were minuscule compared to the overall project. The turn pockets are a good compromise between bicycle and auto facilities. The project is really shaping up and looks to be an improvement for all road users.
The next meeting will be in December, and will include a presentation and vote on the amount and usage of the funds available. Keep your fingers crossed! As for the rest of the crowd in the room, nobody got up and commented about bike lanes, so I’m not sure what they were there for. I left after the bike lane discussion, but the Clear Creek closure was going to be talked about near the end of the meeting. I’ll see what I can find out about this topic.












