Stewart St Extension

Stewart St at the curve, with divided road

The Stewart Street Extension opened in early November (Nevada Appeal article), connecting William Street (Highway 50 East) with Roop St. This project is part of an effort to provide options for getting north-south in Carson City so that Carson Street can be narrowed. The new street segment is divided in some areas (as at right), with right turn only controls going onto or off the street, and part of it is a 3-lane configuration, with two travel lanes and a turn lane (as below).

The new street does not include bicycle lanes. The lanes are wide enough for sharing the lane, which according to the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities (“the bike guide”) is 14 feet or more. It does not have share the lane signs.

Stewart St, 3-lane configuation

I’ve ridden on the street a number of times since opening, and I like it. It is much preferable to Roop because it has less traffic and better lane width. The problem of course is that Stewart Street to the south is narrow without lanes or wide lanes, and Roop Street to the north is the same, so it is an isolated segment of bike route.

What do you think? Do you like it or not? Do you feel more or less safe than on a road with striped bicycle lanes? Does it need share the lane signs? [W11-1 and W16-1p] or [R4-11] are the two options.

The classic problem with bicycle lanes is that they accumulate debris as all the vehicle debris (cars parts and items that blow out or drop out, intentionally or unintentionally) and natural debris gets swept into the bike lane by passing cars. Though bike lanes do get street sweeping treatment, it happens less often than any of us would like. Do shared lanes like Stewart St have this problem any less or more than streets with striped bicycle lanes?

As a vehicular cyclist, I (Dan Allison) prefer shared lanes to bicycle lanes. When using a bicycle lane, I have to come out to, or to the left of, the bike lane stripe at every intersection in order to prevent drivers from turning right in front of me or into me. This is the famous “right hook” that accounts for half of all driver-caused crashes. When there is a shared lane, I naturally just move into the center of the lane at every intersection. However, there is a lot of disagreement about this in both Carson City and nationally, with a lot of people preferring painted bicycle lanes. Of course budgets influence what is built, since having a five or six foot bicycle lane often requires a bit more right-of-way for the roadway.

The input of Muscle Powered to Carson City Public Works will influence whether we see more of or less of these shared lane situations in the future, and that is why I’m asking for you opinion. Speak up!

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Stewart St Extension

  1. I like the concrete divided section, as there is plenty of room for lane sharing. Plenty of facilities for the walkers. There is still light traffic on this road too. Things change a bit when you get to the section with the turn lane in the middle. You instantly lose your space and cars have to drive down the turn lane to get around you. Fortunately this doesn’t happen often, because like I said, there is light traffic. I don’t think the amount of traffic on this road warrants a turn lane. Two wide lanes would’ve been more useful.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s